Revision of Using Emergence to Take Social Innovation to Scale by Meg Wheatley and Debbie Frieze from November 4, 2006 - 10:35

     Despite current ads and slogans, the world doesn’t change one person at
a time. It changes when networks of relationships form among people who share
a common cause and vision of what’s possible. This is good news for those of us
intent on creating a positive future. Rather than worry about critical mass, our
work is to foster critical connections. We don’t need to convince large numbers of
people to change; instead, we need to connect with kindred spirits. Through
these relationships, we will develop the new knowledge, practices, courage and
commitment that lead to broad-based change.
     But networks aren’t the whole story. As networks grow and transform into
active, collaborative communities, we discover how Life truly changes, which is
through emergence. When separate, local efforts connect with each other as
networks, then strengthen as communities of practice, suddenly and surprisingly
a new system emerges at a greater level of scale. This system of influence
possesses qualities and capacities that were unknown in the individuals. It isn’t
that they were hidden; they simply don’t exist until the system emerges. They
are properties of the system, not the individual, but once there, individuals
possess them. And the system that emerges always possesses greater power
and influence than is possible through planned, incremental change. Emergence
is how Life creates radical change and takes things to scale.
     Since its inception in 1992, The Berkana Institute has been experimenting
with the lifecycle of emergence: how living systems begin as networks, shift to
intentional communities of practice, and evolve into powerful systems capable of
global influence. Two years ago, we created the Berkana Exchange to learn how
local social innovation can be taken to scale and provide solutions to many of the
world’s most intractable issues—such as community health, ecological
sustainability and economic self-reliance. The Exchange connects leadership
learning centers around the globe, in such places as Brazil, Canada, India,
Mexico, Pakistan, South Africa, the United States and Zimbabwe. A learning
center is a local initiative committed to strengthening a community’s leadership
capacity and self-reliance by working with the wisdom and wealth already
present in its people, traditions and environment. The purpose of the Berkana
Exchange is to support and sustain a vibrant “trans-local” learning community—a
network that connects local action so that global influence can emerge. By
applying the lessons of living systems and working intentionally with emergence
and its lifecycle, we are learning how to create the conditions for networks of all
kinds to evolve into systems of influence that spread social innovation throughout
the world.

Why we need to understand networks
     Researchers and social activists are beginning to discover the power of
networks and networking. And there is a growing recognition that networks are
the new form of organizing. Evidence of self-organized networks is everywhere:
social activists, web-based interest groups, terrorist groups, street gangs.
     Yet much of the current work on networks displays old paradigm bias. We
repeat our habitual pattern of looking for hierarchy and control mechanisms in the
belief that organization only happens through human will and intervention. We
see this in social network analysis, when physical representations of the network
are created by mapping relationships—thereby depicting the form that has
emerged, but saying nothing about why it formed. Other network analysts identify
roles played by network members, such as “expert” and “lurker,” or make
distinctions between different parts of the network, such as “core” and
“periphery.” Most of these distinctions hark back to our mechanical
understanding of organization—its shape, roles and physical manifestation.
Although It may not be the intent of these researchers, their work is often used
by leaders to find ways to manipulate the network, to use it in a traditional and
controlling way.
     What’s missing in these analyses is an exploration of the dynamics of
networks. As the only form of organization used by living systems on this planet,
networks result from self-organization, where individuals or species recognize
their interdependence and organize in ways that support the diversity and
viability of all. Because networks are the first stage in emergence, it is essential
that we understand their dynamics by exploring such questions as:
! Why do networks form? What are the conditions that support their
creation?
! What keeps a network alive and growing? What keeps members
connected?
! What type of leadership is required? Why do people become leaders?
! What type of leadership interferes with or destroys the network?
! What happens after a healthy network forms? What’s next?
! If we understand these dynamics and the lifecycle of emergence, what
can we do as leaders, activists and social entrepreneurs to
intentionally foster emergence?

What is Emergence?
     Emergence violates so many of our Western assumptions of how change
happens that it often takes quite a while to understand it. In nature, change
never happens as a result of top-down, pre-conceived strategic plans, or from the
mandate of any single individual or boss. Change begins as local actions spring
up simultaneously in many different areas. If these changes remain
disconnected, nothing happens beyond each locale. However, when they
become connected, local actions can emerge as a powerful system with
influence at a more global or comprehensive level. (Global here means a larger
scale, not necessarily the entire planet.)
     These powerful emergent phenomena appear suddenly and surprisingly.
Think about how the Berlin Wall suddenly came down, how the Soviet Union
ended, how corporate power quickly came to dominate globally. In each case,
there were many local actions and decisions, most of which were invisible and
unknown to each other, and none of which was powerful enough by itself to
create change. But when these local changes coalesced, new power emerged.
What could not be accomplished by diplomacy, politics, protests, or strategy
suddenly happened. And when each materialized, most were surprised.
Emergent phenomena always have these characteristics: They exert much more
power than the sum of their parts; they always possess new capacities different
than the local actions that engendered them; they always surprise us by their
appearance.
     It is important to note that emergence always results in a powerful system
that has many more capacities than could ever be predicted by analyzing the
individual parts. We see this in the behavior of hive insects such as bees and
termites. Individual ants possess none of the intelligence or skills that are in the
hive. No matter how intently scientists study the behavior of individual ants, they
can never see the behavior of the hive. Yet once the hive forms, each ant acts
with the intelligence and skillfulness of the whole. And over time, even though the
individual ants die off, the hive develops greater intelligence.
     This aspect of emergence has profound implications for social
entrepreneurs. Instead of developing them individually as leaders and skillful
practitioners, we would do better to connect them to like-minded others and
create the conditions for emergence. The skills and capacities needed by them
will be found in the system that emerges, not in better training programs.
     Because emergence only happens through connections, Berkana has
developed a four stage model that catalyzes connections as the means to
achieve global level change. Our philosophy is to “Act locally, connect regionally,
learn globally.” We focus on discovering pioneering efforts and naming them as
such. We then connect these efforts to other similar work globally. We nourish
this network in many ways, but most essentially through creating opportunities for
learning and sharing of experiences and shifting into communities of practice.
We also illuminate the work of these pioneering efforts so that many more people
will learn from them. We are attempting to work intentionally with emergence so
that small, local efforts can become a global force for change.

The Life-Cycle of Emergence
     
Stage One: Networks.
We live in a time when coalitions, alliances and
networks are forming as the means to create societal change. There are ever more networks and now, networks of networks. These networks are
essential for people finding likeminded others, the first stage in the life-cycle of emergence. It’s important to note that networks are only the beginning. They are based on self-interest--people usually network together for their own benefit and to develop their own work. Networks tend to have fluid membership; people move in and out of them based on how much they personally benefit from participating.

Stage Two: Communities of Practice.

Networks make it possible for people to find others engaged in similar work. The second stage of emergence is the development of communities of practice (CoPs). Many such smaller, individuated communities can spring from a robust network. CoPs are a self-organized. People share a common work and realize there is great benefit to being in relationship. They use this community to share what they know, to support one another, and to intentionally create new knowledge for their field of practice.
These CoPs differ from networks in significant ways. They are communities, which means that people make a commitment to be there for each other; they participate not only for their own needs, but to serve the needs of others.
     In a community of practice, the focus extends beyond the needs of the group. There is an intentional commitment to advance the field of practice, and to share those discoveries with a wider audience. They make their resources and
knowledge available to anyone, especially those doing related work.
     The speed with which people learn and grow in a community of practice is noteworthy. Good ideas move rapidly amongst members. New knowledge and practices are implemented quickly. The speed at which knowledge development and exchange happens is crucial, because local regions and the world need this knowledge and wisdom now.

Stage Three: Systems of Influence.

The third stage in emergence can never be predicted. It is the sudden appearance of a system that has real power and influence. Pioneering efforts that hovered at the periphery suddenly become the norm. The practices developed by courageous communities become the
accepted standard. People no longer hesitate about adopting these approaches and methods and they learn them easily. Policy and funding debates now include the perspectives and experiences of these pioneers. They become leaders in the field and are acknowledged as the wisdom keepers for their particular issue. And critics who said it could never be done suddenly become chief supporters (often saying they knew it all along.)
     Emergence is the fundamental scientific explanation for how local changes can materialize as global systems of influence. As a change theory, it offers methods and practices to accomplish the systems-wide changes that are so needed at this time. As leaders and communities of concerned people, we need to intentionally work with emergence so that our efforts will result in a truly hopeful future. No matter what other change strategies we have learned or
favored, emergence is the only way change really happens on this planet. And that is very good news.